Re: Moving forward ...

Craig Hughes <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:49:35 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.asrg.filtering
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Yes, SUPERIDS might set some admin's pager off, or log something, or 
whatever.  But meanwhile someone downstream's had their email 
intercepted and/or altered, and might want to be notified of that.  The 
admin might call them, or send a separate email, but you could say the 
same about any type of filter down the line too; it seems that if 
anything should or could be inserting headers in the email to notify 
the downstream that some filtering action's been taken, then this would 
qualify, but doesn't, I think, fit in with any of the 3 things you'd 
outlined earlier.

C

On Feb 26, 2004, at 2:44 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think you're discussing an implementation of a protection scheme.
> Generally this would be logged, or some sort of audit flag would be
> raised for an admin.  I wouldn't see an email with a filtering header 
> as
> this flag though.
>
> Am I not grokking your point here?