Re: Starting in on a document
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:37:24 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.rmx |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> wrote: > > My opinion is that we should describe the smallest design and > > implementation which will address as much of the problem as possible. > > No. For two reasons: First, we don't have a precise description of the > problem yet. Hmm... I had thought that the scope statements narrowed down the problem to something fairly straightforward: publishing and verifying consent on the use of domain names in EHLO/HELO and MAIL FROM. > Second: Keep the 80/20 rule in mind. You usually can solve 80% of the > problem with 20% of the work/cost. Following your proposol, we'd have > to describe a solution which is cheap (20%), but does solve only 80% > of the problem. This won't sell. I understand. Do you have examples as to why a small design is unsufficient? Alan DeKok.