Re: Melting proposals together
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> Fri, 03 Oct 2003 13:31:59 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.rmx |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> wrote: > What do we focus on? > > - EHLO/HELO name > - envelope sender Yes. > - header sender (From:) No. > I actually have doubts about the EHLO/HELO name. There is > no need for a MTA to announce the sender domain names in the > HELO name. The HELO name should be the name of the machine, not > related to the following emails. I understand, but RFC 821 and 2821 are unclear on this issue. > A second problem is that this could break existing software. > Many MTAs do not give a proper name at HELO/EHLO, or do not > issue this command at all. Many other MTA's refuse to speak with anyone who doesn't use HELO/EHLO. Alan DeKok.