Re: sender rewriting scheme

At 2:28 PM -0400 2003/10/06, Meng Weng Wong wrote:

>  Any kind of designated sender scheme will, in the worst case, break
>  every .forward in existence.

	This was one of my complaints about this sort of solution on the 
main ASRG list.  I have yet to hear of any solution to this problem, 
or anyone who cares about this problem.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <[email protected]>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
     -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)