design specifics --- the config label

On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:56:38AM -0400, Alan DeKok wrote:
| 
|   It looks like there is significant overlap between the proposals in
| terms of goals and limitations.  This means that we should quickly be
| able to come up with a unified proposal.
| 
|   I would like to have a rough draft of a unified proposal by the end
| of next week.

Does anyone have an objection to doing the config label?

The thing that returns "permit:mx; permit:spf; permit:host=foobar.com;
permit:cidr=special-list.foobar.com; deny:default".

If not, shall we use config._smtp_client.DOMAIN label or something else?

Any comments on the syntax of the above?

If we're going to do CIDR in TXT, I believe Hadmut has spent the most
time thinking about those issues.

Who has experience doing RFCs?  I believe there's an XML formatting
scheme but I don't know much more.

We could start collaboratively editing a document on a Wiki somewhere.