Re: Issues page has been updated

"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> wrote:
>   I will be out of town on Monday, so I won't be able to do much work
> then.  What I would like to see is proposals for an outline for the
> final document, with references to sections from the various drafts
> which may be used as initial filler for those sections.

  I'm a little busier than I thought.  A sudden family medical
emergency means that for the next few days, I'll be sporadically
checking my mail.

  In the mean time, we need to address the following concerns:

  - can this solution be slightly extended to more generic consent
    information in DNS?  e.g. reverse-ip.rmx.consent.domain ...

  - we need to decide what, exactly is the design.  RMX is slightly
    different than the others.  If Hadmut can integrate the design of
    his proposal with the others, it means that the only disagreement
    will be syntax in DNS, and not the general approach

  - we need a preliminary guideline for a "graduated approach" to the
    solution.  e.g. "use EHLO/HELO in this way, and then MAIL FROM"

    The various solutions need to be integrated, and I can't do it
today or tomorrow, as I had expected.  Remember, we're working on a
tight schedule, and discussions surrounding the design will be
counter-productive, unless we have specific design details to talk
about.

  Alan DeKok.