Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> Sat, 28 Feb 2004 14:22:29 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.smtpverify |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > Right. That tells me that a system that can be deployed incrementally > and get incrementally useful results will be a lot more useful than > one that won't be useful until most of the net deploys it. Can we add that statement to the ASRG web site? e.g. I've been forced to use a content filter in the past 2 months, as my personal inbox has hit 90% spam. I'm not seeing many false positives, but the false negatives are still more spam than I was getting a year ago. So my personal incremental solution helps, but it's still provably insufficient. Alan DeKok.