Re: Scope of SMTP Verify
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:50:45 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.smtpverify |
|---|---|
| Organization | SolidMatrix Technologies, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Peter J. Holzer wrote: > On 2004-03-08 16:46:10 -0500, Alan DeKok wrote: > >>"Peter J. Holzer" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >>>> Why is it not using it's own MTA to send mail? >>> >>>What is "it's own MTA"? The designated outgoing MTA for the domain in >>>the return path? >> >> Pretty much. MUA's should use MTA's to send mail to MTA's. Your >>MUA shouldn't be using SMTP to talk to my MTA. > > > It isn't. In fact I don't know any MUA which sends mail directly to the > recipient's MX. That doesn't mean none exist, but they are pretty rare. > So this seems to be a bit of a red herring. > > The more common case is that someone sets up an MTA on a PC and does not > configure it to relay through their ISP's smarthost. That doesn't make > the MTA a MUA. Also worms, spambots, etc. are not MUAs (they don't > interact with a user). > I thunk we are refering to a case of a hijacked computer which is sending out email directly to someone's MTA. In that case, it appears as if an MUA is sending email to someone's MTA. Yakov