Re: Email Web of Trust - Problem Statement

Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> wrote:
> >   Agreed.  So we don't try to solve it.  There are still numbers which
> > we can publish which are emperically verifiable, useful, and not
> > readily available on the net today.  The question is what those
> > numbers are...
> 
> Then it is really trust? Sounds more like reputation.

  Agreed.  I may trust you, but for a third party, my public statement
of trust is called "reputation".

  Alan DeKok.