FWD: Another note from the IETF list
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:05:21 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.smtpverify |
|---|---|
| Organization | SolidMatrix Technologies, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: move to second stage, Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:20:38 -0600 From: Eric A. Hall <[email protected]> To: [email protected] References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> On 3/16/2004 3:41 PM, Yakov Shafranovich wrote: > How would introducing trust help with the spam problem? Would the cost > of doing so perhaps would be so prohibitive that we will not be able to > do so? Is it really possible to introduce trust that will actually work? Trust is a contiuum, like everything else related to security. Different people will have different levels of trust; having a marketplace of trust brokers -- each of whom provide different levels and strenghts based on different factors -- is appropriate. Some people and/or services will require notarization-based trust, others will be happy knowing that blacklist-dujour.org doesn't think the sender is scum. I don't see what cost has to do with it. The IETF only needs to provide standardized mechanisms for negotiating trust between end-points. Leave the brokerage functions (and the implementation costs) to the service providers who want to enter the market.