Re: Single model or framework for reputation/trust
Ed Gerck <[email protected]> Mon, 03 May 2004 09:39:59 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.smtpverify |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
When people talk about "trust" in "trust management" they usually mean authorization and authorization management. Just to be clear, my comment is not about semantics. Authorization is a well-defined, objective statement that can be provided, managed, enforced and even delegated. Trust is an inter-subjective statement that stands behind an authorization. Trust cannot be managed. BTW, much of the "trust" discussion in these documents could be cleared at once by using authorization instead of trust (even though "trust" has more buzzword appeal). Cheers, Ed Gerck "Viktor S. Grishchenko" wrote: > > BTW, there are some good start points for digging on the topic of > Trust Management: > > Related conference (Trust Management, 2nd int): > http://www.trustmanagement.cclrc.ac.uk/ > (proceedings available: Springer-Verlag, E50) > > Interesting blog on the topic: > http://moloko.itc.it/paoloblog/archives/categories/trust_and_reputation/ > > Also the effort by Semantic Web people: > http://trust.mindswap.org/ >