Re: Devilish: Forget about DNS
Mark Foster <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:55:29 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.smtpverify |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:20:51PM -0500, Yakov Shafranovich wrote: > What bothers me is that there are two separate identities at stake here: > 1. Identity of the incoming MTA. > 2. Sender's identity Many of the MTAs in use today support the STARTTLS mechanism. In order to accomplish this, the MTA must be configured with a X.509 certificate that is either self-signed, or signed (issued) by a certficate authority. Also, some of those MTAs can be configured to use the same (or different) certificate outgoing (as a client), and to recognize certificate authorities for trust verification. But AFAIK none of the MTAs I have looked at currently support CRL or OSCP. In talking about secure Internet email, everyone seems focused on S/MIME certs for end-users. Why not also advocate the use of certificate verification (PKI) in message relaying MTA-to-MTA? This just seems like a natural direction for the email infrastructure. -- Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints... Mark Foster <[email protected]> http://mark.foster.cc/