Re: Greylisting BCP

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.asrg
Message-ID <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14FF1@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 2:51 AM
> To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF
> Subject: Re: [Asrg] Greylisting BCP
> 
> On the other hand, if it stops a reasonable amount of spam, it reduces
> bandwidth, processing time and storage requirements, as well as human
> time & annoyance handling the spam.
> 
> It's up to the implementer to decide whether the cost of implementing
> greylisting is more or less than the cost of not implementing it.

Right.  Enumerating such tradeoff considerations is ideal material for a document such as this one.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.