RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a punishment

Martijn Grooten <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.asrg
Message-ID <18B53BA2A483AD45962AAD1397BE13253846E0FE87@UK-EXCHMBX1.green.sophos>
It was nice to see the RFC being published. Good work.

Then I came across this:

http://blog.vamsoft.com/2012/01/24/ub-black-uribl-com-url-blacklist-started-to-block-everything/

(Vamsoft ORF is a spam-filter.) Basically uribl.com was returning 127.0.0.1 to _all_ queries from nameservers that are sending high volumes (presumably without paying for it) as some kind of punishment. http://uribl.com/ confirms that.

Now, as Vamsoft mentions, it is not a good idea to use third-party nameservers on a server you're making DNS requests from. (Although, unlike openDNS, Google's nameservers do return NXDOMAIN when they can't resolve a domain.) Moreover, it does seem Google's nameservers are now getting REFUSED as a response to any uribl.com request. I was just wondering whether the RFC says anything about this kind of behaviour ('listing' everything as a punishment). To my reading it doesn't.

Martijn.

Virus Bulletin Ltd, The Pentagon, Abingdon, OX14 3YP, England.
Company Reg No: 2388295. VAT Reg No: GB 532 5598 33.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.