Re: RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a punishment

"Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.asrg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 1/24/12 4:29 PM, David Romerstein wrote:
> On 1/24/12 10:19 AM, Emanuele Balla (aka Skull) wrote:
>> In truth there's
>> in point 3.3:
>>
>> «  Note: In Section 3.4, it is noted that some DNSBLs have shut down in
>>     such a way to list all of the Internet.  Further, in Section 3.5,
>>     DNSBL operators MUST NOT list 127.0.0.1.  Therefore, a positive
>>     listing for 127.0.0.1 SHOULD indicate that the DNSBL has started
>>     listing the world and is non-functional. »
>>
>> and again, in point 3.5:
>>
>> «  A functioning DNSBL MUST NOT list 127.0.0.1.  There are a number of
>>     mail server implementations that do not cope with this well, and many
>>     will use a positive response for 127.0.0.1 as an indication that the
>>     DNSBL is shut down and listing the entire Internet.»
> 
> "Listing 127.0.0.1" is not the same as "returning 127.0.0.1".

Damm. FAIL. :-D


-- 
Paranoia is a disease unto itself. And may I add: the person standing
next to you may not be who they appear to be, so take precaution.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bofhskull.wordpress.com/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.