Re: RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a punishment
Dave Warren <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/25/2012 10:37 AM, SM wrote: > At 07:07 24-01-2012, Martijn Grooten wrote: >> (Vamsoft ORF is a spam-filter.) Basically uribl.com was returning >> 127.0.0.1 to _all_ queries from nameservers that are sending high >> volumes (presumably without paying for it) as some kind of >> punishment. http://uribl.com/ confirms that. > > "After investigating this further, it seems the affected ORF users > all use Google public DNS servers for the queries (or use such servers > as forwarders in their local DNS configuration)." > > Anyone using open recursive DNS servers or their ISP's DNS server for > DNSBL queries is asking for trouble. The listing is to get the > attention of the sender. It's "antisocial". I have to wonder, if a DNSBL were being operated entirely on a free basis (rather than a freemium model), might it not be better to take advantage of the large caches out there rather than having thousands of individual servers performing the same mundane set of lookups individually? Obviously this negates the DNSBL's ability to try and pull cash out of the larger entities, but purely from a resource management point of view, if someone wants to offer a front-line cache for free, surely that should reduce load. -- Dave Warren, CEO Hire A Hit Consulting Services http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren