Re: RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a punishment

Dave Warren <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.asrg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 1/25/2012 10:37 AM, SM wrote:
> At 07:07 24-01-2012, Martijn Grooten wrote:
>> (Vamsoft ORF is a spam-filter.) Basically uribl.com was returning 
>> 127.0.0.1 to _all_ queries from nameservers that are sending high 
>> volumes (presumably without paying for it) as some kind of 
>> punishment. http://uribl.com/ confirms that.
>
>   "After investigating this further, it seems the affected ORF users
>    all use Google public DNS servers for the queries (or use such servers
>    as forwarders in their local DNS configuration)."
>
> Anyone using open recursive DNS servers or their ISP's DNS server for 
> DNSBL queries is asking for trouble.  The listing is to get the 
> attention of the sender.  It's "antisocial".

I have to wonder, if a DNSBL were being operated entirely on a free 
basis (rather than a freemium model), might it not be better to take 
advantage of the large caches out there rather than having thousands of 
individual servers performing the same mundane set of lookups individually?

Obviously this negates the DNSBL's ability to try and pull cash out of 
the larger entities, but purely from a resource management point of 
view, if someone wants to offer a front-line cache for free, surely that 
should reduce load.

-- 
Dave Warren, CEO
Hire A Hit Consulting Services
http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.