Report-as-Spam header

Brendan Hide <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.asrg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all

Has a spam reporting header been considered, similar to the 
List-Unsubscribe header in RFC2369? Already many Bulk Mail service 
providers provide readable headers directing recipients where to send 
spam complaints. I don't think this is standardised in any way however.

One of my specialities is handling abuse complaints and monitoring 
outbound spam blocking systems. The performance of my team and I have a 
direct correlation to network reputation and RBL listings as a result of 
compromised end-user accounts. Automated (or even semi-automated) 
suspension of compromised accounts would aid in this field and would 
probably outperform any army of abuse-complaint "specialists".

The notion of being able to report back to the responsible ISP/mail 
server directly without going through a long process is attractive. In 
some environments a relay cluster with outbound anti-spam scanning could 
even report high-spam-scoring mails with little to no human intervention.

Differences between List-Unsubscribe and "Report-as-Spam":
List-Unsubscribe is added by List Maintainers or Mailing-List 
Distribution servers. Report-as-Spam could be added by the mail or relay 
server independently of the sender's MUA when the server receives the 
mail. The implication is that every "MAIL FROM" could result in a unique 
Report-as-Spam ID, similar to where Message-Id would be generated. If a 
relay server implicitly trusts a mail server that already adds a 
Report-as-Spam header then the relay server would not bother to add 
another header.

Drawbacks:
Broken Header/Header Abuse? - My guess is that we will probably end up 
with RBLs targeting servers that relay with invalid headers
Performance - Mail servers implementing an automated suspension system 
would need to maintain a database (or would need to be able to trawl its 
own logs) for the account responsible for the abuse. This does not 
necessarily have to be a large database, however it is conceivable that 
some mail systems will want to trim this database to only include recent 
outgoing mail.

Advantages:
Better First Response against compromised accounts
Standardisation of as-of-yet incompatible/incongruent features

Any comments, positive or negative, would be appreciated, unless its 
simply a link to those lists of "why your idea won't stop spam". This 
isn't supposed to stop spam, its supposed to make fighting spam more 
effective for responsible ISPs.

-- 
__________
Brendan Hide
http://swiftspirit.co.za/
Web Africa - Internet Business Solutions
http://www.webafrica.co.za/?AFF1E97
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.