Re: DNSBL caches and IPv6, again
Matthias Leisi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALgnk9rvTgck03PUc9fQXLMq0Vw8AW8qyjkZS89yz61hEDpRmQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:27 AM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > So, anyone got server log [IP,timestamp] data they can share? I have [IP, # of queries] on a daily level from DNS query logs from dnswl.org, eg in a file named "2012-08-03.aggregate": | 178.63.223.135 1 | 219.255.134.101 4992 | 156.45.254.31 80 These are the numbers we see at the authoritative servers, ie after caching by (mostly "medium" in your terminology) local resolvers. We only collect about a third of the logs (we are only interested in relative numbers, so that is not an issue for our own purposes). Despite sanity checks, there are about 1% odd IPs, eg from those who forget that they should use reverse-nibble notation for the lookups, funny internal IP addressing schemes leaking out, DNSxLs trying to look up whole ranges etc). We also have data in the same format for the DNS server IPs that actually query our servers. We keep this data for about a month (the higher aggregated data, ie sender magnitudes, top query sources etc are kept in the DB for longer). <shameless plug>We do not yet collect data on IPv6. If you want to help us to change that, see http://www.dnswl.org/news/archives/26-Do-you-want-to-support-the-dnswl.org-project.html</shameless plug> -- Matthias