Re: DNSBL and IPv6
Dave Warren <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/19/2012 15:41, John Levine wrote: >>> What I feel needs to happen is that policy needs to put in place to RIRs >>> (via ISPs) can present "what is a customer" on a network level, and then >>> this information can be put into DNS somehow, and used for DNSBL. > Yeah, I've been talking to people on and off about this for over a > year. Even though providers can lie about their allocation > granularity, most won't, and the ones that lie would probably merit > total blocking anyway. I'm less worried about those that lie outright than those that just don't care either by not bothering to specify a policy at all (unless it becomes mandatory somehow), or have more granularity than can be clearly specified in a single policy. For example, their policy might be to allocate at the /64 level, but unless they also prohibit customers from obtaining more than one /64... -- Dave Warren http://www.hireahit.com/ http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren