Re: DNSBL and IPv6
"John Levine" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> Probably not, although I'm waiting for ESPs to figure out that if they >> send every message from a different IP, > >I thought of that but I wouldn't be surprised to overflow the router's >ARP table Well, yes, if you configure stuff in a naive way. I'd route an entire /64 to the mail server, and configure the server as its own router with all of those IP addresses internally forwarded to a single IP that talks to the outside world. If you wanted to do IP hopping, it wouldn't be hard to do. >> it'll be much easier to process bounces and complaints since all >> they'll need is the IP to figure out what the list and address was. > >Is it? For mailing-lists, I think VERP is simpler and more robust. Depends what your intentions are. If you're trying to do listwashing, you may wall see DNSBL listings rather than bounces. I like VERP just fine and my lists use it, but I do get back FBL reports that are munged to the point where I can't tell who complained. But they rarely munge the IP. R's, John