Re: misconception in SPF
Daniel Feenberg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.GSO.4.64.1212071411420.29874@nber6> |
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, SM wrote: > Hi Paul, > At 08:53 07-12-2012, Paul Smith wrote: >> Yes, the MX is for receiving mail only, according to the SMTP standard, >> BUT if you work on the assumption that you have to be able to reply to >> the sender (which is a common > > Actually no, or else people would not be using noreply@example. Anyone sending mail from [email protected] would not be seriously inconvenienced if they were required to have a working MTA at example.com, even if they wanted to use a non-working username at that domain. In fact, that is what I generally see in such mail. daniel feenberg > > Regards, > -sm > _______________________________________________ > Asrg mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg >