Re: misconception in SPF

>...so the "vulneravility" exists ! may be spammers don't know it yet !
>don't you believe that a phish with these characteristics could be
>worse than other?

No, I don't see any reason to think that www.paypal.com is more likely
to fool users than paypaI.com.  Because of the way that Paypal uses
Akamai to distribute its load, adding a TXT record to www.paypal.com
would be rather difficult.

SPF has been around for about a decade.  If this hack were useful, I
think we can assume that spammers would use it.

R's,
John