Re: misconception in SPF

This posting demonstrates why the main line of this thread is useless.

d/



On 12/10/2012 7:59 AM, Christian Grunfeld wrote:
> I'm really surprised to see how discussions diverges on this list !
>
> The problem statement is very simple:
>
> 1) How many people on this list saying that SPF is bad have TXT
> records published on their domains ? Why do you use it in real life
> and deplore it here ?
>
> 2) How many people on this list that use SPF have only one TXT record
> at the top domain and remain relaxed having [?~-]all, ignoring this
> thread ?
>
> I accept that some of you don't mind that a third party can use your
> subdomains to send forged emails claiming that are from you. I
> personally don't like that and applied the fix !
>
> I repeat, this thread started discussing an SPF problem and then
> derived in a lot of other problems. We can discuss any, but please
> don't blame it on SPF of all of them !
>
> over and out!
> _______________________________________________
> Asrg mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
>

-- 
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net