Re: whitelisting links (was Re: misconception in SPF)
Martijn Grooten <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> 2. Have the email client distinguish between links that are > whitelisted and those that aren't. I'm with Paul in that I think the web browser and/or a web proxy is a more appropriate place to do that. Other than the fact that they are simply better at anything web-related (they can, for instance, do some heuristics on the actual content that's being delivered by the web server), I'm worried that a "this link is fine" message displayed by a MUA is easily confused with "this email is fine", which I don't think is desirable. Also, the overwhelming majority of websites are completely fine and harmless, yet most are probably too obscure to end up on some kind of whitelist, let alone a personalised one. So I think you're going to have a lot of collatoral damage. Having said all this, maliciious links in email are a serious problem today. Whenever I need a link to the Blackhole exploit kit for research purposes, I simply dig into my spam folder and look for a fake Facebook/LinkedIn/Twitter/YouTube/UPS email. More often than not it contains such a link. Martijn. ________________________________ Virus Bulletin Ltd, The Pentagon, Abingdon, OX14 3YP, England. Company Reg No: 2388295. VAT Reg No: GB 532 5598 33.