Re: whitelisting links (was Re: misconception in SPF)

Martijn Grooten <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.asrg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>    2.  Have the email client distinguish between links that are
> whitelisted and those that aren't.

I'm with Paul in that I think the web browser and/or a web proxy is a more appropriate place to do that.

Other than the fact that they are simply better at anything web-related (they can, for instance, do some heuristics on the actual content that's being delivered by the web server), I'm worried that a "this link is fine" message displayed by a MUA is easily confused with "this email is fine", which I don't think is desirable.

Also, the overwhelming majority of websites are completely fine and harmless, yet most are probably too obscure to end up on some kind of whitelist, let alone a personalised one. So I think you're going to have a lot of collatoral damage.

Having said all this, maliciious links in email are a serious problem today. Whenever I need a link to the Blackhole exploit kit for research purposes, I simply dig into my spam folder and look for a fake Facebook/LinkedIn/Twitter/YouTube/UPS email. More often than not it contains such a link.

Martijn.

________________________________

Virus Bulletin Ltd, The Pentagon, Abingdon, OX14 3YP, England.
Company Reg No: 2388295. VAT Reg No: GB 532 5598 33.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.