Re: misconception in SPF
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon 10/Dec/2012 18:32:48 +0100 Martijn Grooten wrote:
>
> Heck, you can even use google.com, the SPF record of which only
> tells the receiving MTA that it probably wasn't Google who sent the
> email, for it uses ~all rather than -all. And even if it did use
> -all, it doesn't necessarily mean that the email wouldn't get
> delivered as not all spam filters/MTAs block SPF fails.
^^^^^^^
Does that imply that most, or even a relevant percentage of them, do?