Re: Countering Botnets to Reduce Spam

Rich Kulawiec <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.asrg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In addition to Chris's excellent comments:

- Connecting a [Linux or other] server to a P2P network may not be possible
or desirable in many/most instances.

- Use of a technique like this might leak information on which software
is installed, which versions, etc.

- It will trigger false positives whenever software is upgraded/patched.
(I say "will" because very long experience with tripwire and similar
taught me this a long time ago.)

- If the server has been subverted, then this mechanism can also
be subverted.

- Linux systems are not a significant component of botnets.  I've been
doing passive OS fingerprinting for most of a decade, and they're in
the noise floor.  It's still true now, as it was years ago, that
bot-originated spam comes from Windows systems to about six 9's.

- Better techniques already exist, such a firewalling outbound port 25
by default and only punching holes for systems that actually need to
send mail.  Another example: monitoring the TCP connection rate to
port 25 on remote systems -- spam-senders are likely to push it much
higher than "normal".

---rsk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.