Re: Countering Botnets to Reduce Spam
Rich Kulawiec <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In addition to Chris's excellent comments: - Connecting a [Linux or other] server to a P2P network may not be possible or desirable in many/most instances. - Use of a technique like this might leak information on which software is installed, which versions, etc. - It will trigger false positives whenever software is upgraded/patched. (I say "will" because very long experience with tripwire and similar taught me this a long time ago.) - If the server has been subverted, then this mechanism can also be subverted. - Linux systems are not a significant component of botnets. I've been doing passive OS fingerprinting for most of a decade, and they're in the noise floor. It's still true now, as it was years ago, that bot-originated spam comes from Windows systems to about six 9's. - Better techniques already exist, such a firewalling outbound port 25 by default and only punching holes for systems that actually need to send mail. Another example: monitoring the TCP connection rate to port 25 on remote systems -- spam-senders are likely to push it much higher than "normal". ---rsk