Re: Countering Botnets to Reduce Spam
Chris Lewis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12-12-14 08:17 PM, John Levine wrote: > Other than the magic term P2P, what does this provide above what > packages like Tripwire do now? Any particular distribution of Linux > is installed from a known set of masters, where the files have known > checksums. The checksums are not large, and are not a big deal to > retrieve. What does P2P add? Random other Linux boxes are certainly > not more likely to have a set of good checksums than, say, an https > server run by a well known distribution organization. I _suppose_ it might make it a bit more feasible to obtain checksums of random code that isn't necessarily in sync with a Linux dist. In many hosting environments, there can be literally as many versions of, say, Wordpress, as there are customers. The admins steadily patch the basic O/S, but often they won't touch the customer's images for fear of breaking them. Or virtualized systems. Just imagine how many different O/S images there are on a cloud. Eg: Amazon expects the customer to do their _own_ patching. I really don't think the idea would work in the end of the industry (cloud, multi-host platforms) that need it most.