Re: Computer Security Communication Network
"John Levine" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> The aforementioned distributed, decentralized computer security > communication network, a computer system for the dissemination of > instantaneous computer security information between computer > scientists is an interesting topic. Since this assertion is rather dubious, we can skip the rest of the message for now. We already have effective ways to distribute material from a central point, such as CDNs. We also already have usenet (yes, it still exists and some parts remain quite healthy.) The main thing that a distributed network provides is the ability for anyone to send out material, but as we've seen on usenet, that instantly falls afoul of Sturgeon's Law. In the meantime you might take a look at DCC: http://www.rhyolite.com/dcc/ It is not totally open like typical p2p networks, but anyone with resonably large mail volume and who doesn't smell like a sleazeball can run a server that exchanges DCC data, and anyone at all can contribute message hashes. It's relatively resistant to bad guys because the main thing you can do to poison it is to report hashes of single messages as spam, which doesn't help other than for a rather arcane DoS.