Re: Development of an object assessment format/protocol

On 3/4/2013 5:29 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> We need, I think, a mechanism via which we can ask more complex questions
> and get more comprehensive answers.  We need a mechanism which isn't
> a hack on top of DNS, but which has been developed from the ground up
> specifically for this purpose.


By way of exploring a baseline, how does what you are asking for differ 
from the Repute work:


    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/repute/charter/

Can it be a value-add enhancement to it? If not, why?

d/
-- 
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net