Re: Thinking outside the box
Marc Perkel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/17/2013 6:28 AM, Martijn Grooten wrote: >> Once you have secure private delivery of messages using >> public/private keys, you don't need to create a reputation system to >> decide what to deliver. Each recipient will have a personal contacts >> list and if the sender is not in that list the message won't be >> opened. This starts the new dream system with zero receipt of spam >> and therefore zero profit for spammers thus no spam. Every message >> can be received and delivered to the users messaging agent. > So that's kind of what sites like Facebook and Twitter already do with > direct messages: you can only send them to someone who has added you as > their friend or is following you. > > It's true that would stop the bulk of the spam being sent. > > It's also fairly trivial to build something like that on top of the > existing SMTP infrastructure. > > It doesn't prevent spam sent via compromised accounts though. > > It also kills a lot of the current uses of email, which depend on more > or less unsolicited emails being sent. > > Martijn. > > ________________________________ > > Virus Bulletin Ltd, The Pentagon, Abingdon, OX14 3YP, England. > Company Reg No: 2388295. VAT Reg No: GB 532 5598 33. You don't want to kill the ability of a stranger to contact you. If I'm a vendor and I want new customers to email me then the system needs to make sure that can happen. I like this process - throwing out ideas just to see what sticks.