Re: Thinking outside the box

In article <[email protected]> you write:
>Barry Shein wrote:
>
>> A FAQ might be useful tho not sure we'd be ready to agree on one.
>>
>> Or some generally accepted, written, set of soft boundaries to
>> discussion.
>>
>> Difficult, I know.
>
>Sure, sure... but back to the original Marc Perkel question ... "build 
>something from scratch". One should redefine what the new hypothetical 
>system shall do... from ... SCRATCH...
>
>And at least... try to ask himself if the idea of, say, "unwanted 
>messages" we had 10 years ago is still valid, if the "set of soft 
>boundaries" remain the same...
>
>In other words... did the "spam problem" changed in the last 10 years ?
>
>