Re: Thinking outside the box
"Roger B.A. Klorese" <[email protected]> Mon, 18 Mar 2013 07:19:54 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/18/13 6:51 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: > 7. Currently, UK legislation includes a weak distinction between > personal and business recipients. It's legal to send UME to business > recipients - presumably there are businesses that like to be on the > receiving end of B2B marketing. But which of these email addresses is > a business address: "[email protected]", "[email protected]", > "[email protected]". I think it's uncontroversial that the first > is business, the last is personal. However, the middle one is > ambiguous (it's a personal local part, in a business domain). I'd like > to see some infrastructure for expressing the concept. Or, a personal > name in the local part makes it a personal address (but what about > jobs@apple…?). Or, maybe the exemption should just be removed entirely. It's clear to me: every address at a business is a business address. Every domain is either business or personal. If businesses wish to control spam within their business domain, that's on them.