Re: e-postage stamps, was Welcome to the new(ish) ASRG list
"John Levine" <[email protected]> 18 Mar 2013 22:33:09 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>Verification of a stamp wouldn't have to be much different from a DNS >>>query. "Is the following n-tuple (perhaps source plus stamp) valid?", >>>or likely valid would be far better than what we have now. >> >> Oh, OK. So you give me one stamp, and I use it on 100,000,000 million >> pieces of mail, each of which verifies. Seems reasonable. > >It's a distributed system with less-than-perfect real-time replication. >So maybe 8 or 10 of them verify before every server knows the stamp is >used. I don't think the scale works. Most payment systems are designed with the assumption that most transactions will succeed, with failed ones relatively uncommon. In the e-postage world where 90% of the mail is spam, I'd expect 90% of the stamps to be double spent. This also has the adverse selection problem, it encourages phishing, fake drugs, and other high value spammers who figure that it's just a cost of doing business. Or they set up the First Very Authentic E-Postage Bank of Nigeria, and debase the currency.