Re: The introduction problem, was Thinking outside the box

Dave Crocker <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:01:25 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.asrg
Organization Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 3/18/2013 1:52 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> But, if I tell you (and only you) my "public" key, and you sign/encrypt
> your message to me with MY public key, then I can be fairly sure that
> the signed messages I receive aren't spam.

This comes close to saying "first we need a miracle"...

OpenPGP and S/MIME have had roughly 20 years to succeed.  Their patterns 
of actual success are quite notable, but have consistently been for 
relatively small, homogeneous groups.

One can debate plausible explanations for this basic limitation, but the 
raw statistic is clear and should be compelling:  Achieving large-scale, 
per-person authentication and confidentiality among random folk who 
exchange mail is, so far, not possible.  The track record in trying to 
provide this capability makes clear that any future success here demands 
true innovation and considerable caution in the expectations for 
success.  Efforts are far more likely to fail than to succeed.

There is some question as to whether per-person authentication and 
confidentiality mechanisms are at all possible.  Certainly the 
'usability' design requirements are not yet well understood, either for 
end-users or for service operators.

Any discussion about per-person authentication or confidentiality needs 
to start with careful attention to both the technical requirements and 
the very serious human factors constraints.


> Theoretically we can stop email forgery (DKIM, SPF, cryptographic

Theoretically, we can /not/ stop email forgery.  We can limit the 
utility of certain forgery scenarios, but that's quite different.

Any discussion about 'stopping' forgery needs to carefully consider a 
range of reasonable scenarios and the ability or inability of specific 
mechanisms to prevent those scenarios.

It also needs to start with the recognition that forgery hasn't been 
stopped in the physical world, and then it needs to explain why the 
online world is going to have a different rack record...

d/
-- 
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net