Re: The introduction problem, was Thinking outside the box
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:57:25 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Organization | Brandenburg InternetWorking |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/19/2013 9:26 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
> That is one big difference between PGP & S/MIME and something simpler.
>
> I could be on the phone to someone, and they ask me for my email address
> to send me details, I tell them it and I add "and my email key is
> 'bibble'". Then, when they send the message to me, their email client
> asks for that, and hey presto, I get the message.
Paul,
The tenor of your postings is one that is quite popular for topics that
have a poor track record at Internet adoption. The confidence in such
postings asserts that there are reasonably simple methods that could be
extremely successful.
The predicates for such confidence tends to be:
1. Failure to inspect previous failures in detail.
2. Assignment of relevant-but-simplistic blame on those failures.
3. Failure to study the many, varied and serious barriers to success
at Internet-scale adoption, at the technical and human factors levels.
4. Failure to formulate a proposal in enough detail to work through
those barriers.
Ideas -- even good ones -- are amazingly cheap. Viable ideas based on
the details that make them viable, are amazingly difficult.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net