Re: Spam sent from compromised (web)hosts vs botnet spam

Chris Lewis <[email protected]> Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:32:43 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.asrg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 13-03-21 04:41 PM, Dave Warren wrote
> If we wanted to get serious about this type of implementation, an SMTP
> extension could do the trick.

What do you think the odds are that spammers will implement anything
like that in their bot cannons?

IOW: the SMTP tools establishing the SMTP connection to the recipient's
MTAs are owned and implemented by the spammers in probably more than 90%
of all spam.

They have no incentive to provide you with a workable complaint channel.

If you wanted to announce it, you'd have to announce in a way that was
keyed off IP address/allocations, _not_ something inband with the spam.

Kinda like rDNS ;-)
-
This is the asrg mailing list.  To change your subscription settings, see
http://lists.services.net/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr/domain=lists.gurus.org