Re: limitations of reputation, was Spam sent from compromised
Barry Shein <[email protected]> Sun, 24 Mar 2013 14:00:39 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On March 23, 2013 at 20:23 [email protected] (Martijn Grooten) wrote: > > For example, if you send too many (I have no idea what "too many" is > > exactly) msgs or statuses on Facebook they pop-up a captcha to > > continue. It's happened to me, doesn't take much to set that off and > > it's not overly burdensome. > > This may well work for ISPs and webmail providers. (I'm looking at you, > Yahoo!) Which accounts for what percentage of spam sources? In particular, botnet population? My guess is: almost all of it. Based on not much. But if I'm right... > For this to be used Internet-wide, you get something like hashcash, the > Wikipedia page on which is pretty good: ...that probably isn't very important, tho nothing wrong with it. But I thought the problem always was that with millions of botted PCs why would spammers care a lot about a work scheme like hashcash? > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashcash > > It also links to a rather good research paper which goes some way > towards showing why it might not work: > > http://www.hashcash.org/papers/proof-work.pdf > > I think that paper it's a good example of doing research on something > that would require a significant change to the email infrastructure. You > could use similar methods to prove that your idea would work. The paper mentions what I did about botnets, and several other interesting points. -- -Barry Shein The World | [email protected] | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada Software Tool & Die | Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo* - This is the asrg mailing list. To change your subscription settings, see http://lists.services.net/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr/domain=lists.gurus.org