Re: Speaking of spamhaus...

On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 13:45 -0400, David Romerstein wrote:
> As much as I agree with your sentiment, Krebs' attacker(s) in this 
> instant aren't (known to be) spammers. You've chosen a poor example.

Speaking very much from the cheap seats, I don't believe that matters a
jot.

Where large amounts of money are involved, whatever the methodology for
making it - people will fight to protect their methods. It's been seen
throughout history.

The point isn't whether or not that's a particularly good example. The
point is that what we (the "Internet community", for want of a better
term) are trying to do is to hurt the revenue streams of a small section
of that "community". That's never well received.

Graeme

-
This is the asrg mailing list.  To change your subscription settings, see
http://lists.services.net/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr/domain=lists.gurus.org