Re: Web host spam vs spam filters
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:53:37 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu 20/Jun/2013 22:22:22 +0200 Chris Lewis wrote: >> >> Yes - though I've been told that most of the scripts used to send >> botnet spam aren't very different than what's used on Windows boxes. >> At least they don't seem to use the local MTA. > > Right. All of the ones I've seen are written in PHP or Perl, and do > direct-to-MX. > > The operators of these machines tend to be at least somewhat more > technically astute than the canonical "grandma on DSL", and real MTA > logs are too much of a dead giveaway as to the presence and ultimate > eradication of the malware. OTOH, while firewalls on Windows boxes tend to maintain lits of what processes are authorized to do outbound connections, on *nix servers the concept is different. But Linux iptables has an xt_owner module that matches on a uid range, so, beside blocking outbound port 25 on non-MTAs, one could block attempts to send mail by wrong user-ids on MTAs. Undoubtedly a sign of barbarization... - This is the asrg mailing list. To change your subscription settings, see http://lists.services.net/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr/domain=lists.gurus.org