Re: Water tight opt-in (yet another FUSSP)
Dave Warren <[email protected]> Sun, 29 Dec 2013 16:59:55 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2013-12-29 09:56, Gordon Peterson wrote: > This whole thing seems to me like a solution in search of a problem. I > don't believe that most ISPs want to serve as intermediaries between > their users and (legitimate, at least) list services. While I agree that most ISPs don't want to be involved, the reality of it is that filtering bulk mail is a far easier problem to solve than filtering spam, but a lot of bulk mail is actually wanted/desired. As a mailbox provider, it would make my life a lot easier if I could whitelist every piece of bulk mail that a user actually wants upfront, allowing me to blacklist (or score down) with impunity. Unfortunately, this is a FUSSP since it would require virtually all bulk senders to comply in order for recipients to yield benefit from it. -- Dave Warren http://www.hireahit.com/ http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren Never try to extort more than it would cost to have you killed. - This is the asrg mailing list. To change your subscription settings, see http://lists.services.net/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr/domain=lists.gurus.org