Re: Water tight opt-in (yet another FUSSP)

On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 12:28:35PM +0100, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> I don't think I got that.  D'you mean "direct access" as an
> alternative to letting some social network notify for them?

No. This might be me not understanding the proposal correctly, but it sounded that as a recipient, you would give some senders a (tagged) address that would make the email go straight to your inbox. In that case, some ISPs will have a large collection of such addresses, that someone with malicious intention would like to obtain.

But again, I might not have understood the proposal very well.

Given my scepticism about the need for such a solution in the first place, I'd be hesitant to ask you to write down the details. But if you're really keen, I guess that would help the discussion.

Martijn.

-
This is the asrg mailing list.  To change your subscription settings, see
http://lists.services.net/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr/domain=lists.gurus.org