Re: IPv6 mail, was Let's try to be productive...
Martijn Grooten <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:00:33 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 07:33:52AM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote: > you mean other than the fact that none of the envelope information > is protected/authenticated? > > i thought the point of the exercise was to have a validated basis > for making per-user distinctions. Yes, sorry, I should have said the Return-Path header. Or some new fancy header that is always equal to the envelope from. But if you want to drop connections from unwanted addresses as early as possible - as you could do if there's a per-user sending IPv6-address - you can actually use the envelope from for that, because you don't really care if it is correct/authenticated. (The point I tried to make is that I don't think per-user IPv6-addresses would solve anyone's problem, but that if it did, they'd already have the tools to solve it.) Martijn. - This is the asrg mailing list. To change your subscription settings, see http://lists.services.net/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr/domain=lists.gurus.org