Re: IPv6 mail, was Let's try to be productive...

Martijn Grooten <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:00:33 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.asrg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 07:33:52AM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
> you mean other than the fact that none of the envelope information
> is protected/authenticated?
>
> i thought the point of the exercise was to have a validated basis
> for making per-user distinctions.

Yes, sorry, I should have said the Return-Path header. Or some new fancy
header that is always equal to the envelope from.

But if you want to drop connections from unwanted addresses as early
as possible - as you could do if there's a per-user sending IPv6-address
- you can actually use the envelope from for that, because you don't
really care if it is correct/authenticated.

(The point I tried to make is that I don't think per-user IPv6-addresses
would solve anyone's problem, but that if it did, they'd already have
the tools to solve it.)

Martijn.

-
This is the asrg mailing list.  To change your subscription settings, see
http://lists.services.net/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr/domain=lists.gurus.org