Re: [AVTCORE] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-payload-tsvcis-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Barry Leiba <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.avt |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALaySJKDkTi5-QC_Frf9NxJDv8H98v0=haYp7E9sMZ53+4FvKw@mail.gmail.com> |
> 2. Section 4.1: > Change controller: IETF Payload working group delegated from the > IESG. > > IESG should we adjust this immediately to say IETF, although this is the > currently recommended text in RFC 8088. Or are we only adjusting the working > group? What we decided in our discussion was to say "IETF", to give the working group mailing list as the contact information (so in this case, <[email protected]>), and to ask the RFC Editor to remove the contact information after IANA puts it in the registry. (In this case, the Payload working group doesn't exist any more.) Sorry I missed this in my own review, and thanks for catching it. Barry _______________________________________________ Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt