Re: [AVTCORE] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-payload-tsvcis-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

> 2. Section 4.1:
>            Change controller: IETF Payload working group delegated from the
>       IESG.
>
> IESG should we adjust this immediately to say IETF, although this is the currently recommended
> text in RFC 8088. Or are we only adjusting the working group?
>
> v-> So what should the exact replacement test be?
>
> "       Change controller: IETF"
> Or
> "       Change controller: IETF <[email protected]>"

Please bear with us on this, as we're just sorting this out within the
IESG and with IANA and the RFC Editor.

I think we probably want to do it like this:

       Change controller: IETF, contact <[email protected]>

And then when the RFC is published it will just say "Change
controller: IETF", and IANA will have put the contact information in
the registry, or someplace where IANA can give it to people when they
need it (depending upon their GDPR concerns).  But you don't have to
worry about this part -- you'll just see the final edited version
during the "AUTH48" phase.

Barry

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt