Re: [AVTCORE] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-i etf-payload-tsvcis-03: (with COMMENT)

Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.avt
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Eric,

Let me clarify on your first comment:


On Tue, 2019-10-01 at 01:15 -0700, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote:
> 
> -- Section 2.3 --
> C.1) "The assignment of an RTP payload type for this new packet format is
> outside the scope of this document and will not be specified here", possibly
> outside of my expertise area, but, why not requesting a payload type in this
> document? And I see no other documents related to TSVCIS in the AVTCORE WG
> that
> could do it. It also appears to contradict sections 4 and 7.

Which payload type (a number 0-127) that correspond to a specific payload format
(such as TSVCIS) is a dynamically agreed on per RTP session and often RTP
receiver using out-of-band mechanisms, such as SDP Offer/Answer (RFC3261) in
SIP. 
 
Cheers

Magnus Westerlund 


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Network Architecture & Protocols, Ericsson Research
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Torshamnsgatan 23           | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email protected]
----------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature, 5.5 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.