Re: [AVTCORE] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-i etf-payload-tsvcis-03: (with COMMENT)
"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.avt |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you Magnus for the clarification. The original text should then perhaps state that the payload format is agreed 'out of band' Regards -éric On 01/10/2019, 12:40, "Magnus Westerlund" <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Eric, Let me clarify on your first comment: On Tue, 2019-10-01 at 01:15 -0700, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote: > > -- Section 2.3 -- > C.1) "The assignment of an RTP payload type for this new packet format is > outside the scope of this document and will not be specified here", possibly > outside of my expertise area, but, why not requesting a payload type in this > document? And I see no other documents related to TSVCIS in the AVTCORE WG > that > could do it. It also appears to contradict sections 4 and 7. Which payload type (a number 0-127) that correspond to a specific payload format (such as TSVCIS) is a dynamically agreed on per RTP session and often RTP receiver using out-of-band mechanisms, such as SDP Offer/Answer (RFC3261) in SIP. Cheers Magnus Westerlund ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Network Architecture & Protocols, Ericsson Research ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Torshamnsgatan 23 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt