Re: [AVTCORE] Mail regarding draft-ietf-payload-tetra

Dale R. Worley wrote:
> Marc Weustink <[email protected]> writes:
>> Has the payload description any relation to ETSI TS 100 392-19-2 ?
>> Imo it should be avoided to have 2 different RTP payload descriptions
>> for the same (?) TETRA ACELP.
> 
> I tried to track this down.  I think you mean to refer to:
> 
> https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/300300_300399/30039503/01.02.00_40/en_30039503v010200o.pdf
> 
>      ETSI EN 300 395-3 V1.2.0 (2004-09)
>      European Standard (Telecommunications series)
>      Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA);
>      Speech codec for full-rate traffic channel;
>      Part 3: Specific operating features

I was refering to this one:

https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/100300_100399/1003921902/01.01.01_60/ts_1003921902v010101p.pdf

I haven't done an in depth comparison to draft-ietf-payload-tetra it 
seems both try to encode the same information

Marc

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt