Re: [AVTCORE] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-payload-rtp-ttml-03: (with COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.avt |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 03:01:58PM +0000, James Sandford wrote: > Hello, > I'm updating the I-D to address these (and other) comments. I'm unsure what isn't meant by the last item, though. "I might include a short note that the text contents are meant to be interpreted by a human, and content from untrusted sources should be viewed with appropriate levels of skepticism". Surely this applies to any media carried over RTP? Or at least any which may be rendered for a human audience. Basically so, yes. So not adding such a note is perfectly fine. As a little more background, I had started off by thinking about the possible consequences of modifying the timeslot for which a piece of text would be active (whether in the XML or by way of the RTP-timestamp epoch, and whether by direct modification of the contents or by cutting/pasting contents/headers). When the text is subtitles on audio/video content, such rearrangement could cause misattribution or similar. But, as you note, the general case is nothing new. -Ben _______________________________________________ Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt