Re: MIME-Version Header Field
Jered Floyd <[email protected]> 23 Sep 2002 13:00:20 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.beep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Eamon O'Tuathail" <[email protected]> writes: > Do BEEP messages require the MIME-Version header field? > > RFC 2045 states: > > "Messages composed in accordance with this document MUST include such > a header field, with the following verbatim text: > > MIME-Version: 1.0" > > As BEEP carries MIME messages, one could argue that MIME-Version is a > mandatory header. (For those playing along with the home game, this is RFC 2045 Section 4, "MIME-Version Header Field".) I interpret the "Messages" in the quoted sentence to mean "RFC 822 messages", since this RFC is all w.r.t Internet message bodies. While BEEP messages are structured according to the rules of MIME, I don't consider them to be RFC 2045's "Internet message bodies" and thus are exempt from needing the MIME-Version header. All existing specifications and implementations of which I am aware do not use the MIME-Version header. --Jered