Re: MIME-Version Header Field

> "Eamon O'Tuathail" <[email protected]> writes:

> > Do BEEP messages require the MIME-Version header field?
> >
> > RFC 2045 states:
> >
> >  "Messages composed in accordance with this document MUST include such
> >   a header field, with the following verbatim text:
> >
> >      MIME-Version: 1.0"
> >
> > As BEEP carries MIME messages, one could argue that MIME-Version is a
> > mandatory header.

> (For those playing along with the home game, this is RFC 2045
> Section 4, "MIME-Version Header Field".)

> I interpret the "Messages" in the quoted sentence to mean "RFC 822
> messages", since this RFC is all w.r.t Internet message bodies.
> While BEEP messages are structured according to the rules of MIME,
> I don't consider them to be RFC 2045's "Internet message bodies"
> and thus are exempt from needing the MIME-Version header.

Exactly right and even supported by a careful reading of RFC 2045.

				Ned